Homepage
Chart Analysis
Trends
Tips and Education


Top Stock Brokers
Zecco
Tradeking
Etrade
TD Ameritrade
Scottrade
ShareBuilder
Interactive Brokers
Fidelity


Go Back   Stock Forums > Online Investing > Investing Discussion


Welcome to the Stock Trading To Go Forums. By joining our free community, you'll be able to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and remove this message. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please Register Now.

If you arrived here from a search engine, you may want to explore the Main Site first which houses 100s of articles on investment tips, tricks, and education.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-25-07, 12:43 PM
aquaswim47 aquaswim47 is offline
STTG Veteran In The Making
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 393
The Harvard Endowment

Harvard Endowment: Yale Endowment:
12% Domestic 12% Domestic
19% Foreign 15% Foreign
31% Real Assets 27% Real Assets
- Commodities - Real Estate
- Inflation-Indexed Bonds - Oil Gas
- Real Estate - Timberland
17% Absolute Return 25% Absolute Return
13% Private Equity 17% Private Equity
13% Fixed Income 4% Fixed Income

Total = 105% Total = 100%

Smartmoney Magazine, September Edition:
20% TMW - similar to VTI - Wilshire 5000 total market index
15% PRMSX - T Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock
10% EFA - IShares EAFE Index
5% LSBRX - Loomis Sayles Bond
10% GAGEX - Guinness Atkinson Global Energy
3% XME - SPDR SP Metals and Mining
15% HSGFX - Hussman Strategic Growth
2% PCL - Plum Creek Timber Co. Inc.
10% EUEYX - Alpine US. Real Estate Equity
10% PSP - PowerShares Listed Private Equity

Source: Smartmoney Magazine

I wonder what changes we should make this year to get above-average returns. One of my guesses is to lean towards natural gas in energy stocks, to buy retail, financials, consumer staples, and gadgets in the tech sector. I'm really interested in financials and retail at least by April of 2008 or sooner. This portfolio and the following portfolios is taking a look at theory and trying to see why Harvard may have succeeded in obtaining above-average returns; it is by no means, a portfolio that I normally would invest in unless someone could convince me that maybe I should. I think I would hold off on homebuilders until the 2nd half of 2008 but am interested in Chinese real estate for the early part of 2008. I like RIMM but would buy puts on VMW during 2008. Any ideas or suggestions? I think tech has a lot more to room. I think the next expansion will be biotech in nature.

China has begun it's bear market having dropped approximately 18%. I think this will continue. FXP is the ultra-short China option. With it, I would buy TAO (China Real Estate). I would also be interested in (to have a basket), RWX, RAP, FFR, WPS, DRW, and VNQ. I think the spread between real estate and the Chinese market could be a nice return.

Source: Poster OldMoney

Possible Suggested Portfolio (for an investor in his/her 20s and a 9 or 10 for risk tolerance); it's probably not suitable for an investor over age 30. All expense ratios listed are estimates only. I usually would limit real estate to only 20% despite on how much it declined in value; the portfolio of 31% is far in excess of a normal risk position, thus HUGE LOSSES AND SUBSTANTIAL RISK APPLY. I DON'T ENDORSE OR UTILIZE THIS STRATEGY.

In fact, this is not a portfolio that I normally would suggest an individual taking on; it is solely for those who can accept a very high level of risk. It is solely to discuss the Harvard Endowment and doesn't signal my typical investing pattern. The only thing that I'm trying to do is think maybe what the Harvard or Yale or an Ivy-League Endowment might invest in this year. It probably will NOT be similar to any Ivy-League Endowment, but it uses last year's endowment as a starting point. The strategy may lead to HUGE LOSSES AND SUBSTANTIAL RISK AND THUS I DON'T ENDORSE OR UTILIZE THE STRATEGY.

Normally, I suggest someone to limit their commodities exposure to 5% of their portfolio (including natural gas). Moreover, I tend to suggest people to limit their emerging market exposure to 5% of their common stock position; in this case, it would be limited to 1.25% of the portfolio. The portfolio thus has more than 4.5 times as much emerging markets as I would suggest an individual should take on. Even more important, emerging markets have had a run that could run out, thus the strategy may lead to HUGE LOSSES AND SUBSTANTIAL RISK.

Sample Portfolio (involving many real assets):

11% Domestic Equity
(2% VTI, SPY, DIA, or TMW; 4% QQQQ or 2% VBR and 2% VBK; and 5% XLF)

1) VTI (.07% expense ratio) - Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1) SPY (.08% expense ratio) - SPDRs
1) DIA (.17% expense ratio) - DIAMONDS Trust, Series 1
1) TMW (.2% expense ratio) - SPDR DJ Wilshire Total Market

2) QQQQ (.2% expense ratio) - PowerShares QQQ or

2) VBR (.12% expense ratio) - Vanguard Small Cap Value ETF and
3) VBK (.12% expense ratio) - Vanguard Small Cap Growth ETF

3 or 4) XLF (0.24% expense ratio) - Financial Select Sector SPDR

14% Foreign Equity

6% Emerging Markets (2% VWO, 2% RSX, and 2% EWZ) or 6% PRMSX or 6% FEMKX).

1) VWO (.3% Expense Ratio) - Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock ETF
2) RSX (.5% expense ratio) - Market Vectors Russia ETF
3) EWZ (.69% expense ratio) - iShares MSCI Brazil Index

or (not likely an option)

1) PRMSX (1.26% expense ratio) - T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock

or (not likely an option)

1) FEMKX (1.11% expense ratio) - Fidelity Emerging Markets

Others to consider:
GAF (.59% expense ratio) - SPDR SP Emerging Middle East Africa or
DGS (.63% expense ratio) - WisdomTree Emerging Mkts Small Cap Div
GUR (.59% expense ratio) - SPDR SP Emerging Europe
EEM (.74% Expense Ratio) - iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index
GML (.59% expense ratio) - SPDR SP Emerging Latin America
GMM (.59% expense ratio) - SPDR SP Emerging Markets
BIK (.5% expense ratio) - SPDR SP BRIC 40
ADRE (.3% expense ratio) - BLDRS Emerging Markets 50 ADR Index
EEB (.64% expense ratio) - Claymore/BNY BRIC
FXP (.75% expense ratio) - UltraShort FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Proshare

- 8% Developed Equities
(2% EFA, 2% IOO or 2% EFV, 2% VPL, and 2% VGK or 8% FIGRX)
1) EFA (.34% expense ratio) - iShares MSCI EAFE Index

2) IOO (.4% expense ratio) - iShares SP Global 100 Index or
2) EFV (.4% expense ratio) - iShares MSCI EAFE Value Index

3) VPL (.18% expense ratio) - Vanguard Pacific Stock ETF
4) VGK (.18% expense ratio) - Vanguard European Stock ETF

or not likely an option

1) FIGRX (1.09% expense ratio) - Fidelity International Discovery

47% Real Assets

- 8% Oil/Natural Gas (2.5% XOP; 2.5% IEO; 3% NLR)
1) XOP (.35% expense ratio) - SPDR SP Oil Gas Exploration Prod
2) IEO (.48% expense ratio) - iShares Dow Jones US Oil Gas Ex Index
3) NLR (1.07% expense ratio) -
Market Vectors Global Nuclear Energy ETF

- 5% Precious Metals (1% GDX; 1% XME, 1% DBC; 1% SLX; and 1% PRFM)
1) GDX (.55% expense ratio) - Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF
2) XME (.35% expense ratio) -
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining3) DBC (.83% expense ratio) - PowerShares DB Commodity Idx Trking Fund
4) SLX (.54% expense ratio) -
Market Vectors Steel ETF
5) PRFM (.76% expense ratio) - PowerShares FTSE RAFI Basic Materials

- 3% Global Water (1% PIO; 1% PHO; and 1% CGW)
1) PIO (expense ratio = .75%) - PowerShares Global Water
2) PHO (expense ratio = .66%) - PowerShares Water Resources
3) CGW (expense ratio = .72%) - Claymore SP Global Water

- 13% Domestic Real Estate (4.0% VNQ; 4.0% RWR; 2.5% REZ; and 2.5% FIO)
1) VNQ (.12% expense ratio) - Vanguard REIT Index ETF or
2) RWR (.25% expense ratio) - DJ Wilshire REIT ETF
3) REZ - (.48% expense ratio) - iShares FTSE NAREIT Residential
4) FIO - (.48% expense ratio) - iShares FTSE NAREIT Industrial/Office

- 18% International Real Estate (2% RWX; 4% TAO; 4% FFR; 4% DRW; and 4% WPS) or 18% FIREX

1) RWX (.6% expense ratio) -
SPDR DJ Wilshire Intl Real Estate2) TAO (.65% expense ratio) - CLAYMORE/ALPHASHARES
3) FFR (.58% expense ratio) - First Trust FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Glb Real Es4) WPS (.45% expense ratio) - iShares S&P World ex-US Property Index5) DRW (.58% expense ratio) - WisdomTree International Real Estate

or

1) FIREX (1.07% expense ratio) - Fidelity International Real Estate

Caution: RAP (2.25% expense ratio) - RMR Asia Pacific Real Estate Fund; this shows how the expense ratio of the ETFs can be higher than expected especially if the fund doesn't have one listed. Data provided here may have significant discrepancies from the actual expense ratio.
15% Private Equity (10.0% PSP; 5.0% PFP)
1) PSP (.71% expense ratio) - PowerShares Listed Private Equity
2) PFP (.75% expense ratio) - PowerShares Intl Listed Private Equity

18% Absolute Return (8% VLEOX; 5% HSGFX; 5% PRSGX) or (2% EXT; 2% ITA; 2% NXT; 2% DTN; 2% SSO; 2% QLD; 2% UCC; 2% UYG; and 2% USD)


1) VLEOX (1.16% expense ratio) - Value Line Emerging Opportunities
2) HSGFX (1.17% expense ratio - Hussman Strategic Growth
3) PRSGX (.81% expense ratio) - T. Rowe Price Spectrum Growth

OR

1) EXT (.28% expense ratio) - WisdomTree Total Earnings
2) ITA (.48% expense ratio) - iShares Dow Jones US Aerospace & Defense
3) NXT (.5% expense ratio) - NYSE Arca Tech 100 ETF
4) DTN (.38% expense ratio) - WisdomTree Dividend Top 100
5) SSO (.95% expense ratio) - Ultra S&P500 ProShares - Ultra stands for 200% ownership
6) QLD (.95% expense ratio) - Ultra QQQ ProShares
7) UCC (.95% expense ratio) - Ultra Consumer Services ProShares
8) UYG (.95% expense ratio) - Ultra Financials ProShares
9) USD (.95% expense ratio) - Ultra Semiconductor ProShares

Caution: CZG has an expense ratio of 2.07%


Last edited by aquaswim47; 12-27-07 at 03:45 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-27-07, 03:46 AM
aquaswim47 aquaswim47 is offline
STTG Veteran In The Making
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 393
Addition

5% Fixed Income (3% AGG, 3% IEI, 3% BIV, 3% BND, or 3% ITE; and 2% TLT, 2% LQD, or 2% TLH)

1) AGG (.2% expense ratio) -
iShares Lehman Aggregate Bond or
1) IEI (.15% expense ratio) -
iShares Lehman 3-7 Year Treasury Bond or
1) BIV (.11% expense ratio) -
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond ETF or
1) BND (.11% expense ratio) -
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
1) ITE (.14% expense ratio) - SPDR Lehman Intermediate Term Treasury2) TLT (.15% expense ratio) - iShares Lehman 20+ Year Treas Bond or
2) TLH (.15% expense ratio) -
iShares Lehman 10-20 Year Treasury Bond or
2) LQD (.15% expense ratio) - iShares iBoxx $ Invest Grade Corp Bond

Total: 110% (114.5% stocks,
14.5% Fixed Income as it includes 10% of 200% leveraged stock)
Margin 10%

Total 110% (104.5% stocks,
4.5% Fixed income as it includes mutual funds instead of the ProShare Funds)

Just an idea. I'm curious as to maybe how you have a portfolio. Thanks in advance for your comments. I don't advise going above 10% margin because the risk becomes enormous. That means that risk is substantial as margin is 14.5% effectively by using the 200% leveraged shares (the Proshare ETFs).
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-23-08, 09:12 PM
oldstocks oldstocks is offline
STTG Rookie
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 12
Wow - good info. It is interesting how they diversify, even in things that are not producing.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0
Advertisement System V2.4 By   Branden
Copyright ©2005 - 2007, stocktradingtogo.com