Quote:
Originally Posted by stthomas2004
It takes a lot more to move say, a Lucent one dollar than it does a Microsoft. Its all in the percentage.
Look at WYNN which was 67 dollars this date last month, but is now over $95.
100 shares of that would profit you: $2800
Now look at LU which was 2.45 last month, and now is 2.55.
The same dollar amount would be:
2734 shares, with a profit of $273
Most of the lower stocks are more speculative, more risk, and some are just dead in the water from the dot com bust.
I prefer to disagree with you here.
|
You are comparing apples and oranges. Even worse, you throw in the statement about speculation. Which is totally bogus. The amount of risk is the same whether the stock is $1000 per share or $1.00 per share. Risk can be calabrated as well as the cost of the stock. How you govern the risk can balance the playing field.
It may take more to move a stock that is lower priced, on a regular basis, but if it is a stock on the up and rise, then you don't carry the same difficulty in movement. For example, I remember seeing JDSU on the radar 6 years ago at the $2.50 range, now it is at the $18 range. The charts don't show it now, but I have seen the same thing happen with MSFT. In 2000 it was at $120 a share and dropped clear to $21 a share. Now you look at the charts and it doesn't even show $120 per share even showing during that time. Oh well. The point is, that JDSU used to be a very low priced stock. Now it is climbing fairly well. Obviously there had to be sufficient movement to get it there.